Objection of a trustee or creditor to the exemption from personal liability of the debtor for certain excusable debts. The most common reasons include allegations that the debts to be paid were incurred under false pretenses or that the debts arose as a result of the debtor`s fraud while acting as trustee. A pre-trial motion in which the court is asked to prohibit the other party from presenting or even returning evidence for matters that are said to be so prejudicial that no action taken by the judge can prevent the jury from being unduly influenced. These sample sentences are automatically selected from various online information sources to reflect the current use of the word “legality.” The opinions expressed in the examples do not represent the opinion of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us your feedback. The quality of the law and compliance with the law may refer to legality, i.e. compliance with the law, or it may be discussed in principle of legality or discussed as legal legitimacy. In conclusion, I still don`t know what to think of Google when Google discovers content that questions the legality or legitimacy of companies in their search for navigation brands. Legal proceedings that prevent an identical lawsuit from being filed later. The principle of legality is the ideal of law that requires that the entire law be clear, verifiable and not retroactive.
It requires decision-makers to settle disputes by applying previously declared legal standards and not to subsequently change the legal situation by way of derogations from the applicable law.  It is closely linked to legal formalism and the rule of law and can be derived from the writings of Feuerbach, Dicey and Montesquieu. This fig leaf of legality must be removed, otherwise the violence will continue. In criminal law, the principle of legality guarantees the rule of law in all criminal proceedings. (1) According to the benefit-injury theory, appropriate consideration is present only if a promise is made to the benefit of the beneficiary or to the detriment of the promettant, which reasonably and fairly causes the promisor to make a promise to the promiser for something else. For example, promises that are pure gifts are not considered enforceable because the personal satisfaction that the guarantor of the promise can receive through the act of generosity is generally not considered a sufficient disadvantage to justify reasonable consideration. 2) According to the negotiation-for-exchange counterparty theory, there is reasonable consideration when a promising person makes a promise in exchange for something else. Here, the essential condition is that the promisor has received something specific to induce the promise made.
In other words, the market theory for exchange differs from the harm-benefit theory in that the market theory for exchange appears to be the parties` motive for promises and the subjective mutual consent of the parties, while in the harm-benefit theory, the emphasis seems to be on an objective legal disadvantage or advantage for the parties. In contrast, many written constitutions prohibit the creation of retroactive (usually criminal) laws [citation required]. However, the ability to remove laws creates its own problems. It is clearly more difficult to determine what constitutes a valid law when a number of laws may pose constitutional question marks. When a law is declared unconstitutional, the actions of public authorities and individuals who were legal under the invalidated law are retroactively illegal. Such an outcome could not occur under parliamentary sovereignty (or at least not before the factors), since a law was a law and its validity could not be questioned in any court. An agreement between private parties that creates mutual obligations that are legally enforceable. The basic elements necessary for the agreement to be a legally enforceable contract are: mutual consent, expressed through a valid offer and acceptance; appropriate review; capacity; and legality. In some States, the consideration element may be filled in with a valid replacement. Possible remedies in the event of a breach of contract are general damages, indirect damages, damages of trust and certain services. Regardless of the legality of sharing data with law enforcement agencies, this is a breach of trust on the part of our communities. Legality can be defined as an act, agreement or contract compatible with the law or the state of legality or illegality in a particular jurisdiction.
The legal principle that a defendant cannot be prosecuted for an act which is not declared a criminal offence in that court actually concerns the principle of legality, which is part of the overall concept of legality.   However, this lawsuit is less about concussions and more about the legality of informed consent.